UPDATE: Make stack close itself

Richard Gaskin ambassador at fourthworld.com
Wed May 21 14:40:48 EDT 2014

Bob Sneidar wrote:

 > Okay well that is making a little more sense. So if I put an on idle
 > handler in all my stacks and then pass the message, it should filter
 > down to my mainstack. I suppose I could insert the stack-closing-code
 > in all my substacks, but that makes me feel dirty somehow. ;-)

I don't know your code so it's hard to make any recommendations with 
confidence, but it may be simpler to re-examine the relationship between 
idle messages and closing stacks.  A timer, perhaps?

  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World
  LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
  Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
  Follow me on Twitter:  http://twitter.com/FourthWorldSys

More information about the Use-livecode mailing list