repeating string

[Mike Kerner]

because if it's part of the language, and my vocabulary improves, then I
have less crap to move into my libraries, and I would feel a lot less
foolish if I discover such a thing later.  Even worse, when I throw a kluge
into a project, and I can't find it, later, when I need it again, I end up
reinventing the wheel each time, and maybe I remember to use the same
vernacular, and maybe I don't, in which case I end up biffing myself,
sometimes, by using different names in those different projects - synonyms
can suck when the parser isn't insightful.



On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Dave Kilroy <dave at applicationinsight.com>wrote:

> Mike Kerner wrote
> > I was trying to avoid the solution Craig suggested
>
> Why do you want to avoid it? Making a function to do the job seems the best
> way to me!
>
>
>
> -----
> "Some are born coders, some achieve coding, and some have coding thrust
> upon them." - William Shakespeare & Hugh Senior
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/repeating-string-tp4675472p4675487.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>



-- 
On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth
On the second day, God created the oceans.
On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours,
   and did a little diving.
And God said, "This is good."