OpenControl

hh hh at livecode.org
Mon Aug 4 23:48:53 EDT 2014


This explains a lot and solves the situation perfectly. But I didn't want you to apologize.

This was one of the first things I noticed in this community, what you say is heard and has immense weight (even if it is sometimes 4.2% incorrect).

There are impressive landmarks here (or in forum), to specify some:
A "Did you think about this"-line of Craig, a regex-one-liner of Thierry, a "Hmmmmm"-line of Mark-W.,  a "little stack" of Bernd, a "Hi"-shortliner of Mark-Sch., a spikey line with two smilies of Klaus, a "FWIW" note of Richard, an opening "welcome" by Simon or a closing "nagging" by Richmond (I have to stop now or nobody will read to end).

Your words are more than landmarks, rather seen like a monument in front of a train station. I think you should be *very* proud of this. And also, let me say this again, be very careful with this.

> hh wrote:
> > Please be cautious with your direct or indirect "rating":
> 
> jacque wrote:
> Apologies if it sounded like I was giving a "rating." Your method, and 
> the others, will work fine for most stacks. I only meant that in this 
> particular case, it won't.
> 
> I have a suite of hundreds of stacks with tens of thousands of cards. 
> The stacks are created automatically by a building tool based on the 
> contents of text files, and some cards require specific plugins I've 
> written. The plugins need to work independently of the larger system.
> 
> That's because there is a backscript which is the main heartbeat of the 
> app, and it changes the state of every card in both openCard and 
> preOpenCard handlers. Whatever a group sets up is likely to be undone if 
> it uses any of those messages. That's why I need a message that isn't 
> included in the backscript. The same thing would apply to a frontscript, 
> which would change the group state first, and then the backscript would 
> undo those changes.
> 
> I didn't mean to be critical, just explanatory. As I said, any of the 
> methods various people have suggested would be good solutions most of 
> the time.





More information about the use-livecode mailing list