Printing quality in 6.5

Bob Sneidar bobsneidar at iotecdigital.com
Wed Nov 27 22:03:18 EST 2013


Sounds like Mavericks is using the bitmap and not the vector. Any chance you have some kind of font ID conflict?

Bob Sneidar
IT Technician
Integrated Office Technology
bobsneidar at iotecdigital.com<mailto:bobsneidar at iotecdigital.com>
714-401-2407



On Nov 27, 2013, at 15:00 , william humphrey <bill at bluewatermaritime.com<mailto:bill at bluewatermaritime.com>> wrote:

It  happens to me only when I import images.

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Marty Knapp <martyknappster at gmail.com<mailto:martyknappster at gmail.com>> wrote:
For what it's worth, this appears to be related to just this one aftermarket
font. I did try building a standalone in 6.5 and printed from that and it
seems to be fine, so it's this one font in the 6.5 IDE (and any PDFs I
create from there). Works fine everywhere else. How weird is that? We'll see
how it goes.

Marty

I just printed to PDF and enlarged it, looked good, printed the PDF not so
good. This was done on Mavericks. So I then transferred the PDF to a Snow
Leopard machine and it prints fine, so it appears to be a Mavericks issue.
The weird thing is that printing from LC 6.1.3 on Mavericks looks good.

Marty

Hi Marty,

Just done a test and found no problems printing text or high res images
on Mac OS X 10.8.5 to Epson R2000, I can't see any difference at all.

I also printed to PDF and compared enlarged PDFs, still no difference, in
fact at max enlargement in Preview the text is still crisp indicating that
LC printed the text as vector data not pixel data.

Paul


On 2013-11-27, at 1:11 PM, Richmond <richmondmathewson at gmail.com<mailto:richmondmathewson at gmail.com>> wrote:

On 27.11.2013 22:33, Marty Knapp wrote:

I just did a quick test print on my Mac of a stack with a couple of
fields with text in them. In LC 6.1.3 the text is nice and crisp but on 6.5
it's a bit pixelated - definitely lower quality. It looks like it's printing
it as a graphic. Haven't tried it on Windows but this is not good news for
me. Is anybody else seeing this?

Marty Knapp

I don't quite understand how that can have happened.

I thought that 6.1.3 was merged with 6.5.0; maybe not.

Richmond.


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com<mailto:use-livecode at lists.runrev.com>
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode



--
http://www.bluewatermaritime.com

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode




More information about the use-livecode mailing list