Password protection in non-commercial 6.0.1

[Richmond]

On 05/02/2013 01:46 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 5/1/13 5:39 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>>
>> On 02/05/2013, at 7:57 AM, stephen barncard
>> <stephenREVOLUTION2 at barncard.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If it's for your own use, why do you need to protect you stacks at
>>> all? You don't trust yourself?
>>
>> That was going to be my question. The only thing I can think of is
>> for using it as some kind of security feature for data which it's not
>> designed or useful for. Use encrypt instead....
>
> US government restrictions require that certain types of data be 
> secured. (I know what Timothy's stack is about.)
>

Time to cough up some money.