REGEX and Livecode
dochawk at gmail.com
Sat Jan 5 19:08:49 EST 2013
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Robert Sneidar <slylabs13 at me.com> wrote:
> I seem to recall some noise has being made in the past that bits of Linux source
>was actually copied from Unix source, but I don't think anyone ever actually proved
>that. At one point, Novell stated that they didn't think that there was any Unix code
>in the SCO version.
I don't think anything ever came of that, no.
> Linus Torvalds has said that if 386BSD had been available at the time, he
>probably would not have created Linux.
I forget the exact sequencing there. It is a pity that he didn't
stumble across the project (was it still in litigation? I forget.)
386BSD came from a license to BSD. AT&T claimed that it had some of
their code in it. Lawyers made money. Code replaced.
>The original OS X was built on BSD Unix.
386BSD becomes FreeBSD, which amicably splits into FreeBSD concerned
about just a couple of platforms, and NetBSD, determined to run on
anything with a pmmu and the ability to emulate an FPU. NetBSD then
has a far from amicable split and produces OpenBSD as a splinter,
largely/entirely due to Theo's inability to get along with just about
anyone. The three share code back and forth quite often.
If I got everything straight, Darwin was drawn primarily from NetBSD,
but modified to use the Mach microkernel like NeXT. It drew from
other BSD licensed unix, too. However, it release-syncs to FreeBSD
instead (or at least used to). Apple apparently fed back plenty of
bug fixe in the process.
OSX then runs on top of Darwin.
> I do not think it would at all be fair to call Linux UNIX at it's core, as the Linux
>kernel was written in C. The Unix kernel was written entirely in assembly language.
40 years ago, on the PDP-8, the predecessor to the PDP-11, on which it
became famous. The switch to C is *very* early, driven by porting.
Also, there is more than a passing resemblance between C and PDP-11
assembly (and this is not a coincidence. Snarky folks have been known
to accuse one of being the other). The unix kernel was C based by the
time Linus was typing.
The Linux kernel was not drawn from the Unix codebase, but certainly
provides the expected functionality of a Unix kernel. The "at its
core" bit is more my finding describing a unix as "Linux at its core"
a bit backwards.
I've used both extensively. FreeBSD is my own preference, but I've
gone back to macs (which remain primarily BSD boxes for me. But
Spotlight leads to my keeping macos on them.)
Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
More information about the use-livecode