On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Bob Sneidar <bobs at twft.com> wrote: > How is it, after all these years, 64 vs. 32 bit is still biting us in the butt? (Or should it be >butting us in the bit?) Just a rhetorical query. And why aren't we being pestered with 128 bits? [*Ducks and runs*] -- Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462