[OT] EULA and legality
palcibiades-first at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Sep 10 10:28:35 EDT 2012
Its unclear because it is most likely that an EU court, if it ever came to
that, would decide that it was a purchase and not a license. Because if it
walks and quacks like a duck....
Or as Lincoln said, if a tail is a leg how many legs does a dog have? Four,
because a tail is not a leg.
Warren Samples wrote
> ......Why is it unclear? Because you don't understand it or because you
> like it? You are licensed to use the software but only so long as you
> are using it according to the terms under which Apple (in this example)
> agrees to make it available to you. Your license ends when you use the
> software outside those terms. Deciding that the terms don't suit you
> isn't license to ignore them. Your legal option is to find some other
> software with terms you like better or that fit your particular scenario
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at .runrev
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-EULA-and-legality-tp4654675p4654746.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the use-livecode