Protecting stacks

[stephen barncard]

As safe as the encryption employed. We have several choices in Livecode.


On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Alejandro Tejada <capellan2000 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Pierre,
>
>
> Pierre Sahores-2 wrote
> > ;D
> >
> > in response to J. Landman Gay who wrote:
> >
> >> Of course. That goes without saying. But given
> > how long it took the guys who wrote it to reverse
> > their own files, I trust it.
>
> That is an interesting cliffhanger ending
> for this thread!
>
> But, What is your personal conclusion
> about the methods proposed to protect
> stacks?
>
> Safe or Not?
>
> Alejandro
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Transitions-tp4656842p4656929.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>



-- 



Stephen Barncard
San Francisco Ca. USA

more about sqb  <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar>