Effective Filename

Peter Haworth pete at lcsql.com
Wed May 30 14:38:03 EDT 2012


Thanks Klaus and Mark.  For now, I only need this for the main stack but
good to know the difference for the future.
Pete
lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>



On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Mark Schonewille <
m.schonewille at economy-x-talk.com> wrote:

> Hi Pete,
>
> Substacks only have an effective filename while their filename is empy.
> Stacks that exist in memory only have no filename and no effective filename.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Mark Schonewille
>
> Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
> Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
> KvK: 50277553
>
> We will have room for new projects after 1 June. Contact me now and be
> first in line.
>
> On 30 mei 2012, at 20:15, Peter Haworth wrote:
>
> > I'm not seeing any difference between what is returned by "the filename
> of
> > this stack" and "the effective filename of this stack" in a standalone
> > application.  Is that always the case or will there be a difference in
> some
> > circumstances?
> >
> > Pete
> > lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>



More information about the use-livecode mailing list