omitting substacks from standalone

[Peter Haworth]

I'd suggest you have a separate administrative main stack that does
whatever it needs to do to your application stack.
Pete
lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>



On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Dr. Hawkins <dochawk at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Mark Schonewille
> <m.schonewille at economy-x-talk.com> wrote:
> >
> > If this isn't what you want, I'd suggest you explain a little more about
> what you're
> > trying to accomplish.
>
> I have a few "operative" substacks, but I also have an administrative
> substack that sets things in the other stacks that are to be
> hard-wired. I'd rather that this one simply not be in what actually
> ships to people, just in case of some bizarre future hack.
>
> For reasons in a thread from a couple of months ago, I'm going to be
> hard-wiring some things into code, so that they can't be examined.
> This stack manipulates those sections of code.
>
> --
> The Hawkins Law Firm
> Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
> (702) 508-8462
> HawkinsLawFirm at gmail.com
> 3025 S. Maryland Parkway
> Suite A
> Las Vegas, NV  89109
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>