Using "go card" on Linux standalone with -ui

Mark Wieder mwieder at
Sun Sep 25 15:16:11 EDT 2011


Sunday, September 25, 2011, 11:23:40 AM, you wrote:

> Surely the point is that all those operations should be - and AFAICT most are
> - implemented with suitable checks to make sure there is a UI; and that the
> assertion is revealing one which hasn't been.  I just wondered if anyone else
> had come across this before and found out which operation it is that has this
> problem.

I think that's exactly the point. And only the rev team will have
access to the assert statements in the code, so only a QCC entry will
clue them in to the fact that there's an errant check in there
somewhere. I haven't seen that one but I haven't tried to do what
you're doing.

-Mark Wieder
 mwieder at

More information about the Use-livecode mailing list