Heads up, don't use "secure" as a handler name

[J. Landman Gay]

On 9/10/11 2:32 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
> this underscores our earlier disucssion that command and function names
> never be the same as, and in some cases can't *contain* that name at all.
>
> Naming convetions are very important. With a single namespace we have to
> balance human readability with what won't confuse the compiler.

Right. I was just taken by surprise that suddenly "secure" was a keyword 
without warning.

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com