Wasting space on the forum.

[Mark Schonewille]

Thanks for explaining, Francis. Yes, I agree that one level of quoting is sufficient, but I also believe it is necessary.

--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553

Become our partner in sales http://qery.us/16r Start selling Color Converter today. 20% commission!

On 12 nov 2011, at 11:37, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote:

> Hi to all who may have had problems understanding
> my very bad English,
> 
> You are correct, I did mention 6 and 7 levels,
> I felt sure that many of you would think that this
> is a little excessive.
> 
> Of course, Mark, I agree that one level is perfectly
> acceptable, IF the mail is counsel, or an answer
> to a question. It saves people scrabbling to find
> out what the question was ........ :>)
> 
> And it is certainly useful to those who don't consult
> the forum regularly.
> 
> As for those who thought my thread wasted more
> disk space than 6/7 levels of repetition over an
> indeterminate period of time, I'm sure you would
> grudgingly agree that this is obviously false.
> 
> I hope this closes the debate.
> 
> -Francis
> 
> "Nothing should ever be done for the first time !"