Efficiency question for list modification

[Peter Brigham MD]

On Mar 12, 2011, at 6:13 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:

> You're right. Sorry - I was misled by the docs, which describe the  
> order of the combine following the description of the 'first' form  
> of the combine command, and then go on to describe the second form,  
> including the fact that the keys of the array must be all numeric.   
> I put 2 + 2 together and got a much too large answer :-(

"2 + 2 = 5, for sufficiently large values of 2."

-- Peter

Peter M. Brigham
pmbrig at gmail.com
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig