Hide A Stack, But Not Hide A Stack?

[Pete]

Just tried that - it still turns up in the Application Browser (and all its
substacks).
Pete
Molly's Revenge <http://www.mollysrevenge.com>




On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Kennan Ray <kray at sonsothunder.com> wrote:

> You could load the stack into memory nut not open it by using the trick:
>
> get (there is a stack <pathToAStack>)
>
> This would put it in the "mainstacks" but NOT in the "openStacks".
>
> I think that would hide it from the Windows menu but may not keep it out of
> the Application Browser (I'm not at a computer so I can't confirm that).
>
> Ken Ray
> Sons of Thunder Software
>
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Scott Rossi <scott at tactilemedia.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to "hide" a stack from the LiveCode IDE while keeping
> the
> > stack available to other open stacks?  I'm not referring to visibility,
> but
> > rather inclusion in open stack lists.
> >
> > I have a tool stack which is built for use in the IDE that has a couple
> of
> > support stacks it uses for scripts and objects.  Is there any way to
> "hide"
> > the support stacks from such lists as the Application Browser and the
> Window
> > menu so that they don't clutter up the user's IDE, but are still
> available
> > to my tool stack?
> >
> > Thanks for any recommendations.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Scott Rossi
> > Creative Director
> > Tactile Media, UX Design
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>