Where does survive the inventive user ?

[Chipp Walters]

Al,

While certainly LC would be wonderful as a scripting language for Open
Office, there are significant business issues which come to mind preventing
such use. The most obvious being LC is not Open Source.

IMO, Open Office is not enough of a "draw" to warrant LC swallowing the open
source pill.

On Saturday, August 6, 2011, Alejandro Tejada <capellan2000 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Chipp,
>
> I agree with your commentary about the differences
> between Now and Then.
>
> Everyone agrees that this platform needs more
> exposure and in a previous message, I asked about
> the possibility of creating some plug-in to use
> LiveCode as an alternate scripting language
> in Open Office:
>
> http://framework.openoffice.org/scripting/release-0.2/index.html
>
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Scripting/How_the_Scripting_Framework_Works
>
> The advantages of using LiveCode are
> notable, while working with text, words,
> lines...
>
> What do you think of this idea?
>
> Al
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Where-does-survive-the-inventive-user-tp3698117p3724370.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>

-- 
Chipp Walters
CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc.