send vs dispatch and continuously running processes

[DunbarX at aol.com]

Obligatory. Otherwise there is no vehicle for any other interaction. This 
was the basis for last week's thread, where it was discussed how to dig into 
a running process from outside that process. You cannot.

Fortunately, in this case the "wait" command is within the operating 
handler, and control can be delegated, and acquired, as needed.

Craig Newman

In a message dated 9/30/10 10:15:49 AM, bonnmike at gmail.com writes:


> If you DO use a repeat loop, the 'wait <time> with messages' is pretty 
> much
> obligatory right? So you can setup an exit strategy and so that pending
> messages (such as sends and dispatches) will still be processed, right?
>