OT: general name for...

Andre Garzia andre at andregarzia.com
Wed Sep 22 13:56:49 EDT 2010

LiveCode does not fit OOP paradigm, it is almost procedural and imperative
but it is not due to the message path.

I think we should call our "subroutines": definitions, it is a generic
enough term and it has good semantics, it means something we applied a name
for. So a handler, a function and a commmand are just that definitions.

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Malte Pfaff-Brill
<revolution at derbrill.de>wrote:

> Hi David,
> AFAIK in procedural languages this would be a subroutine, in OOP languages
> a method
> Now, in which category does liveCode fit? <g>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_%28computer_science%29
> Cheers,
> Malte_______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.

More information about the Use-livecode mailing list