Web Deployment

-=>JB<=- sundown at pacifier.com
Tue Sep 21 14:32:41 EDT 2010


You may be right but they have mentioned plugin with on-rev
in the past if I remember correctly.  I think that is the link that
is supposed to make your on-rev site rev compatible rather
than being just another site on the web.  I could be wrong
though because it is hard to follow a lot of things.

-=>JB<=-



On Sep 21, 2010, at 11:21 AM, stephen barncard wrote:

> web deployment=plugin
> 
> they don't list on-rev accounts yet
> 
> On 21 September 2010 11:18, -=>JB<=- <sundown at pacifier.com> wrote:
> 
>> I purchased the on-rev package when it came out and now when I look
>> at my account it says Web Deployment - already purchased.  I also am
>> a Enterprise user so it may be connected to that but it sounds more like
>> it is connected to on-rev to me.
>> 
>> -=>JB<=-
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 21, 2010, at 6:08 AM, David Bovill wrote:
>> 
>>> On 21 September 2010 12:28, -=>JB<=- <sundown at pacifier.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I think it is the On-Rev package that has been offered
>>>> for quite some time now and many have purchased
>>>> it already so if they continue to develop it more will
>>>> likely purchase it and with the right improvements
>>>> it can exceed their sales expectations.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> That would make sense - On-Rev has (commercial) potential, but I don't
>> think
>>> it is the case. If you look at the Standalone Settings (I am viewing it
>> with
>>> a trial license) - the Web settings that allow you to create a revWeb
>> plugin
>>> has the option to purchase a $199 upgrade - I assume this is in order to
>> let
>>> you make these plugins as this export option has nothing to do with using
>>> On-Rev. It is not clear, if you can make them for non-commercial use, but
>> it
>>> looks like the standalone builder will stop making revWeb plugins after
>> the
>>> trial expires?
>>> 
>>> Personally I can (sort of) imagine people paying $30 for the ability to
>> make
>>> revWeb plugins - I really don't get this $199 pricing. The rest seems
>>> logical to me, and I do very much like the branding LiveCode, but it
>> seems
>>> the current pricing strategy will have two clear outcomes:
>>> 
>>>  1. It will clobber Linux sales - I think the bundles would be better
>>>  Mac+Linux and Windows+Linux.
>>>  2. Deter future revWeb plugin development when it becomes clear how
>> many
>>>  people will pay for it as an isolated feature.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> use-revolution mailing list
>>> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-revolution mailing list
>> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> Stephen Barncard
> San Francisco Ca. USA
> 
> more about sqb  <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> 




More information about the Use-livecode mailing list