Observations on Unicode, RunRev and Operating Systems
Scott Rossi
scott at tactilemedia.com
Fri Sep 3 16:27:53 EDT 2010
Recently, Richmond wrote:
> If one opens a Unicode font with a font development program what the
> user sees are lots and lots of glyphs; what most people don't see are
> all sorts of
> rules as to how they should behave when the end-user types something
> using that
> font, possibly also using a text-encoding algorithm built into their
> operating system.
>
> Why should we care?
>
> Because, while Windows Vista and '7', and Linux works wonderfully with
> Unicode
> fonts giving those rules cognisance, Mac OS and Windows XP don't . . .
What do you mean "all sorts of rules as to how they should behave"? Kerning
pairs? Ligatures? Multi-key characters? Something else?
If you're really talking about Mac OS (pre OS X), I wouldn't be surprised.
AFAIK, Unicode was only in its infancy when Mac OS was around, and general
adoption probably took a while. By then, OS X was coming on the scene, so
presumably most/all development efforts were shifted to that OS.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX Design
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list