missing field in aplication browser
Peter Haworth
pete at mollysrevenge.com
Mon Mar 8 12:58:44 EST 2010
Unfortunately, I don;t have an answer for this problem but wondering
if anyone can help with general group maintenance question.
Grouping and ungrouping objects by selecting them on a card works
great in simple situations but when you have multiple levels of nested
groups or hidden fields or even hidden groups (as recommended for tab
controls for example), it can be a nightmare to add or delete an
object. I'm wondering if I'm missing something and perhaps there's
another way to add an object to a field without ungrouping and
regrouping? What would be great is a drag/drop mechanism in the App
Browser for example, or maybe a popup menu to select a group you want
an object to be added to or removed from.
Mention of the new property for groups also reminds me to ask if there
is a single place where all the changes that have been made in a Rev
release are documented? I haven't managed to find anything like that
for 4.0 and seems like that's kinda basic doc for a new release.
Pete Haworth
On Mar 8, 2010, at 9:31 AM, use-revolution-request at lists.runrev.com
wrote:
> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 20:49:30 -0800
> From: Scott Morrow <scott at elementarysoftware.com>
> Subject: missing fields in Application Browser
> To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
> Message-ID:
> <958C115D-029C-4830-A2C1-0194143F414A at elementarysoftware.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Recently, in one of my projects, the Application Browser stopped
> showing fields that were in a group. Furthermore, the fields in this
> group no longer allow text to be hilited. (The text can still be
> edited, but not something that is really usable.) The fields are
> obviously still there and running "put the num of flds of this cd"
> into the message box returns "18" Yet only one field shows in the
> Application browser. The field that does show is not in a group.
> I've tried trashing the preferences file and reinstalling rev. I
> was hoping not to deconstruct and rebuild the groups. Has anyone
> else run across this? Thoughts?
> Rev 4.0 Enterprise
>
> Scott Morrow
>
> Elementary Software
> (Now with 20% less chalk dust!)
> web http://elementarysoftware.com/
> email scott at elementarysoftware.com
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list