Crybaby Grows up

[DunbarX at aol.com]

So I was looking at the actual openstack handler, which was:

"insert the script of this stack into back" (also was "start using this 
stack")

And thought I would change it to:

"insert the script of stack myStack into back"

Fixed. Done. And it all makes sense. I am relieved that it was me and not 
Rev.

One MINUTE later Jackie writes with basically the same idea.

In HC, my gadget is an external window, actually a more complex object to 
manage, but one that never could have this sort of issue. The very ordinariness 
of having a regular stack do the job opened the possibility of the trap I fell 
into.

Thanks to all. I got my hands dirty, which is what I really need.   Can't 
wait to uncomment that stupid "/REVEXCLUDE02" line.

Is there anything to discuss about why putting the msg stack script into 
"back" is not a good idea?

Craig Newman




In a message dated 2/27/09 1:58:52 PM, jacque at hyperactivesw.com writes:
> 
> Light bulb just went on...maybe. You may have set up a bad loop.
> 




**************
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
%3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)