OOP in Rev...
m.schonewille at economy-x-talk.com
Wed Mar 19 10:38:11 EDT 2008
The availability of OOP really doesn't affect the scope of
applications. Nor does it affect the use of C++. You won't be able to
use C++ anyway, you need to create externals for that, which you can
do already. Last but not least, I can't think of any code more
readable than Talk code.
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
A large collection of scripts for HyperCard, Revolution, SuperCard and
other programming languages can be found at http://runrev.info
On 19 mrt 2008, at 15:19, viktoras didziulis wrote:
> me too like rOOP, but I feel it is a little incomplete, just one
> more step. The ones that you call real objects are limited to user
> interface controls only. The thing I was curious about is a
> possibility to create an independent data object which is nor
> control neither a gui element. Which in this case may simply mean
> enhanced arrays...
> What for ?. I think this would make code cleaner and reduce amount
> of commenting in larger projects.. Also facilitate creation or
> adoptions of existing libraries in C or C++ for very specific
> purposes - like reading shapefiles, netcdfs, doing geographical
> transformations, astronomy, bioinformatics, etc... This consequently
> will increase the scope of applications that can be created in Rev
> and hopefully availability of diverse libraries.
> In general it would make creation of complex software easier. We can
> already simulate objects using arrays, but at least the code would
> be more readable (!!!) if I were able to distinguish array
> operations from object manipulations.
> Best wishes
More information about the Use-livecode