Reply to both (is RR too hard / easy?) and (is RR marketed to dev'rs only)

[Judy Perry]

Thanks, Phil.  I'll definitely check it out.

OTOH, just what I need -- another mail group ;-)

Judy

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Phil Davis <revdev at pdslabs.net> wrote:
> Judy Perry wrote:
>>
>> I believe the official response was that they are open to anything we
>> have to offer to them; anyone, please correct me if I am wrong.
>>
>> Judy
>>
>
> Hi Judy,
>
> Was this the moment where someone mentioned Rev Interoperability Protocol
> ("RIP") and Richard (asleep at the wheel... I mean, lost in thought..)
> didn't hear it?  ;o)
>
> Actually RIP compliance might be a good thing for such demo/example stacks.
> It could provide content for some kind of example browser that tells you a
> little about a stack before you open it.
>
> RIP info is available at:
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/revInterop/
> (but you have to join)
>
> Phil Davis
>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:07 AM, william humphrey <shoreagent at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What did they say? Are we going to get some more example stacks shipping
>>> with RunRev? I think examples of a dozen or more catagories, the
>>> different
>>> databases, SOAP calls, all kinds of things...
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>
> --
> Phil Davis
>
> PDS Labs
> Professional Software Development
> http://pdslabs.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>