Looking for ugly code comparisons
    Bill Marriott 
    wjm at wjm.org
       
    Fri Dec 12 22:41:49 EST 2008
    
    
  
Franois,
> I think you missed the point. Kids are not in business or technology. 
> They are in childhood.
I agree it would be nice if kids could learn to program computers in their 
native tongue. I was curious about this so I poked around on Google a little 
bit and found:
http://www.economicexpert.com/a/Non:English:based:programming:languages.htm
An excerpt:
==========
Known non-English-based programming languages:
Brainfuck - Minimalist programming language, created for the purpose of 
having a compiler fit in < 256 bytes (category 3)
FOCAL - Introduced in 1968 by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC)'s Richard 
Merrill (and derived from JOSS)   (category 2)
HPL - Hebrew Programming Language (category 1)
hForth - A Forth system with an optional Korean keyword set
Lexico - A Spanish language based object-oriented, educational programming 
language based on the. NET Framework.
PILOT - a Computer Aided Instruction language, somewhat similar to LOGO 
(category 3)
Plankalkl - Developed by German computer pioneer Konrad Zuse, who claimed 
to have developed it in the 1940s (category 1)
Var'aq - Based on the Klingon constructed language for television series 
Star Trek  (category 4)
==========
Now, which of these do you think is better than Revolution for teaching 
programming to young children? The Klingon one? 
    
    
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list