Working with csv files that are 5000 lines or more
Jim Schaubeck
schaubeck at mac.com
Wed Apr 9 21:50:57 EDT 2008
Thank you Richard. Great feedback. That makes complete sense as to why repeat for each line is lightning fast
On Wednesday, April 09, 2008, at 06:36PM, "Richard Gaskin" <ambassador at fourthworld.com> wrote:
>Jim Schaubeck wrote:
> > Very good feedback for me. You are correct , the method I was
> > using was very slow (I had no idea).
>
>Superficially the two main forms of repeat look very similar, but under
>the hood they do very different things.
>
>When you do this:
>
>repeat with i = 1 to the number of lines of tData
> get line i of tData
>end repeat
>
>...that second line has to count the lines from 1 to i each time through
>the loop. That's why you saw the increasing slowdown the farther it got
>into the data.
>
>But when you do this:
>
>repeat for each line tLine in tData
> get tLine
>end repeat
>
>...then the engine makes the assumption that the data in tData won't be
>changing, so it doesn't need to count as it goes. Instead it parses as
>it goes, automatically putting the value of each line into tLine each
>time through the loop.
>
>For data sets with just 5000 records, or even 50,000 records, you
>probably don't need an RDBMS to handle them.
>
>In cases where you're processing all records in sequence you probably
>don't even need an array. Arrays are lightning fast for random access,
>such as when you have a list of keys and you need to retrieve their
>values. But the split and combine commands are very computationally
>intensive, so for sequential processing of the full data set the
>overhead of split and combine usually benchmarks as taking longer than
>simply using "repeat for each" on the delimited text.
>
>My WebMerge customers regularly process data sets in the hundreds of
>thousands of lines, and write me happy notes about how good the
>performance is. :)
>
>I wish I could take credit for it, but really it's all Scott Raney, the
>fella who owned the engine at the time the "repeat for each" form was
>added. It's a godsend.
>
>--
> Richard Gaskin
> Managing Editor, revJournal
> _______________________________________________________
> Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
>_______________________________________________
>use-revolution mailing list
>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list