Tri-state checkboxes

Mark Powell mark_powell at symantec.com
Fri Feb 23 12:22:33 EST 2007


Thanks to all for your suggestions, but they do not precisely fit what I
need.

The image solutions assume one look-and-feel...if the standalone were to
be run on Vista, for example, the image would have the wrong motif when
compared to the neighboring conventional checkboxes.  And Stephen's
solution uses disabled as the third state, which is not what I need.   I
need an enabled third state.

I am guessing this is not possible, but any other ideas are greatly
appreciated.

Mark


On 23 Feb 2007, at 14:01, Mark Powell wrote:

> I know there is debate among HIF designers that such a thing should 
> exist in the first place, but let's assume that one has a good reason 
> for it:
>
> My question is, is there any Rev-native way of doing tri-state 
> checkboxes?  Where a checkbox can have an ON, OFF, or "equivocal"
> setting that signifies something between ON and OFF.  If not Rev- 
> native, has anyone cooked up their own solution whose look and feel is

> cross-platform compatible (so that the tri-state checkbox can be 
> ganged alongside conventional Rev-native checkboxes, and not stand out

> like a sore thumb)?
>
> I am on 2.8.0
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution




More information about the use-livecode mailing list