Is this weird or is it me?
trancepacific at gmail.com
Thu Oct 12 04:00:51 EDT 2006
On 10/11/06 5:23 PM, "Trevor DeVore" <lists at mangomultimedia.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 11, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Ken Ray wrote:
>>> Actually what I mean is that it shouldn't act like it doesn't
>>> exist... if
>>> you click on a disabled opaque button, it shouldn't pass the click
>>> to things
>>> behind it...
>> Ah. I could see how you could make an argument either way but like
>> Malte I have come to rely on the current behavior.
>I think where I'm coming from is that none of the other xTalks I've used
>(HyperCard, SuperCard, Oracle Media Objects, etc.) behave this way, so to
>it seems "wrong". I wouldn't want to suggest that it should be changes to
>break other people's code, but perhaps some way to make it not do that (a
>new global property, a new object property, etc.) would be nice.
Logically, I think this is a bug. When clicked, a disabled button should by
definition NOT do anything, lest of all pass a click to any other object.
More information about the Use-livecode