Weirdness Passing Messages
J. Landman Gay
jacque at hyperactivesw.com
Fri Mar 24 11:12:30 EST 2006
David Burgun wrote:
> Incidentally, the above works just fine regardless of the stack/card/
> object using "put <something> into me". The problem I described
> yesterday was brought to light because when a new folder is selected, I
> wanted to select the first line (file) in the list, so inside
> ISM_FolderSelect(), I did a ISMPutMessage("ISM_FileSelected, kFileKind,
> line 1 of me), when this happened, "me" in the receiving handler got
Which is reasonable, I think. Think about this a moment -- parameters
are always evaluated before being passed. When you pass "me" in a
parameter, the "me" will refer to the object currently executing the
script, not the target object the script will eventually refer to later.
This is normal behavior.
Take this example:
The addNums handler will receive a parameter of "2", not "1+1". Ditto
for "me", which will be interpreted as the object *currently* running
the script, not the future target of the handler reference.
When passing a reference parameter, use an ID or other static reference,
not "me" which is always subject to interpretation. As you found out. ;)
If you absolutely must use "me" then you can try putting the parameter
in quotes to force it into acting as a string. Strings won't be
evaluated. I don't know if this will work in your situation but you can
Now that I understand your usage better, I do not think this is a bug.
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
More information about the Use-livecode