Pass - is it really needed
jerry at daniels-mara.com
Fri Mar 17 17:05:38 EST 2006
Actually, I thought of a serious answer to this dilemma.
I was thinking of putting a "-- pass [sys msg name]" in every blank
system message handler Constellation creates. That way the user could
un-comment the "pass". Like Chipp, most of the time I find the "pass"
in a default handler unneeded.
The other approach is to include a pass on those system message
handlers where it is likely to be needed--those being the ones that
the Rev IDE counts on your passing, in particular.
Buy Constellation from Runtime Revolution!
On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:37 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:
> Yep, I'd prefer Constellation not place a 'pass' automatically in
> handlers. I'm sure Jerry will add it as a preference some day :-)
> But, you gotta love the tabbed browsing AND the GREAT debugger
> which doesn't flake out for no apparent reason. Jerry's told me
> he's worked really hard on making the debugger as robust as
> possible..and it shows.
> Thomas McGrath III wrote:
>> That is correct. I finally see how powerful Constellation is in
>> my work flow.
>> On Mar 17, 2006, at 12:22 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>>> Thomas McGrath III wrote:
>>>> The reason I ask is that when I insert a new command it throws
>>>> in a pass with that commands name by default.
>>> This isn't native Revolution behavior. Are you using Constellation?
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
More information about the Use-livecode