Developer Annoyance #1
JimAultWins at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 17 01:09:21 EST 2006
Ahh, if you are trying to make embedded quotes
as in 'the formatted string' construct ?
where localResult should be the string of calc(varA,varB) of btn "source"
You can do the a few ways depending on your starting and ending strings and
put "calc(varA,varB) of btn ""e&"source""e into localResult
put quote into q
put "calc(varA,varB) of btn "&q&"source"&q into localResult
put "calc(varA,varB) of btn ^source^" into localResult
replace "^" with quote in localResult
make a simple 'formatted string' function that does the quoting for you.
If you are quoting for Unix or shell commands you may have to 'escape' them
in your function.
If you are quoting for HTML or AppleScript or other, you may only have to
produce the simple replacement
Am I understanding your question?
On 3/16/06 9:43 PM, "Arthur Urban" <aturban at qwest.net> wrote:
> I think a new syntax needs to be made available for calling functions
> outside the message hierarchy. The existing mechanism does not lend
> itself to high readability or maintainability. Consider the following,
> if you will:
> put 1 into varA
> put 2 into varB
> put value( merge("calc([[varA]],[[varB]]))", btn "source" ) into
> further, if I need to protect the integrity of the variable passed it
> begins to look like this:
> put "1,2,3" into varA
> put 4 into varB
> put value( merge("calc([[quote&varA"e]],[[varB]]))", btn "source"
> ) into localResult
> I'm not sure that this is the right direction for any language to be
> headed. Please explain why we can't have the following syntax:
> put calc(varA,varB) of btn "source" into localResult
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
More information about the Use-livecode