Jacque- > Try: > start using stack "substack 1" of stack "A" > That puts it in the back. Thanks. It doesn't, but it comes close enough. The syntax I needed was put the script of stack "substack 1" of stack "A" into back I didn't realize you could use the "stack of stack" syntax without the compiler barfing. -- -Mark Wieder mwieder at ahsoftware.net