Stack Switching Question

[Chipp Walters]

I, for one, hope it doesn't dissapear, as I use 'delete stack' quite 
often. It's the only sure-fire way to make sure a stack is closed, and 
I'd have to rewrite many, many stacks if it went away.

It's unfortunately named, and could certainly use a better synonym. But 
it does 'delete a stack from memory' as it says. Once you get the hang 
of it, and know to never use it on subStacks, it's not too bad.

simplsol at aol.com wrote:
> Mark,
> I gave it five votes as well - with the understanding that there would 
> be one comprehensive solution that would address both bugs. It would be 
> welcome news to learn that "destroyStack" had disappeared with the next 
> version of Rev.
> Paul Looney