Stack saving clarification

[Dan Shafer]

Better yet, we could automate the list so that all questions go to a 
Rev CGI that generates a random number in the appropriate range and 
sends the answer back.

Napoleon used to let any incoming messages from his field commanders 
sit unopened for three days, by which time most of the questions were 
moot. Same could apply here, no?

Dan

On Mar 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:

> LOL
>
> That list is perfect. Maybe now we can answer questions via the 
> numbers. "6"
>
> Tom
>
> On Mar 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
>> Len-
>>
>> Sunday, March 20, 2005, 5:32:13 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> LM> WOW!  I sent the first e-mail with this question and at the same 
>> time
>> LM> the digest version came in WITH AN ANSWER BEFORE I THOUGHT OF THE
>> LM> QUESTION! How great is that?!  You not only provide answers, you
>> LM> anticipate my questions before I do!!!!
>>
>> The answers to the next several questions on the list will be:
>>
>> 1. Check the documentation.
>> 2. That's fixed in the latest release.
>> 3. Standalones can't modify themselves.
>> 4. That works on my system.
>> 5. Please Bugzilla that as a bug or a feature request.
>> 6. Yes.
>> 7. No.
>> 8. Maybe.
>> 9. You're using a function like a command.
>> 10. This isn't RealBasic/C++/HyperCard.
>> 11. Menus in OSX have special needs.
>> 12. Check the documentation.
>>
>> -- 
>> -Mark Wieder
>>  mwieder at ahsoftware.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-revolution mailing list
>> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>>
>>
>
> Thomas J. McGrath III
> SCS
> 1000 Killarney Dr.
> Pittsburgh, PA 15234
> 412-885-8541
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>