OT religious controversy

[Jim Hurley]

>
>Message: 17
>Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:42:57 -0800 (PST)
>From: Erik Hansen <erikhans08 at yahoo.com>
>Subject: OT religious controversy
>To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
>Message-ID: <20050224034257.94865.qmail at web61202.mail.yahoo.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>i don't happen to be a "creationist" or
>"intelligent design" advocate, but about
>half of the people in this country
>are. i am certain that some people on the
>list are as well.
>
>religion and politics are two areas where
>we should agree to disagree and leave it
>at that. this list is a community of sorts.
>with so many interests in common,
>polarization and marginalization detract
>from the common goal(s).
>
>[steps down from soap box]
>
>Erik Hansen
>
>=====


I hope no one considered my comments to hold any religious significance.

Actually they were a snippet from a humor article I submitted to the 
New Yorker last year. They didn't think it was funny either.

I need to learn the smiley face conventions :-)

Jim