Rev as server immune to buffer overflow?

[Richard Gaskin]

MisterX wrote:
> I wouldn't be concerned with them as much as securing a transaction protocol
> before doing any net negotiation... Or making a secure registration protocol
> for securing your software. Etc, etc...
> 
> Beware there's a zillion more security holes worse than those. I know a lot
> in Rev but hell im gonna tell ya! Just today, we just got some free tickets
> to a race in zolder.be through a stupid web-form where you could add your
> name to print the ticket in the url ;)) Just an example...

The web form was made in Rev?

All OSes and protocols have security exposures which will affect any 
software using them.

But if you know of security exposures *unique to Rev* I agree that it 
would be counter-productive to publish them, but perhaps equally 
counter-productive to not report them to rev.  Given the potential 
sensitivity of such issue I'm sure Kevin wouldn't mind a personal email 
rather than a public Bugzilla report:  kevin at runrev.com

--
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Media Corporation
  __________________________________________________
  Rev tools and more: http://www.fourthworld.com/rev