Revolution and .swf

[Judy Perry]

Yes. I'm certainly not arguing in favor of DC becomming yet another of
those exceedingly simplistic, true visual programming language
environments.  But rolling their own animator is at the other
unlikely/undesirable extreme.

I had recalled memories of the animation builder as being extremely
twinky.  But it wasn't too awful, really.  For doing simple stuff, it's
okay.  Just maybe for the potential DC audience, it's more than okay.

And better than having no animation tool at all.  And it's scripting-lite
;-)

Judy

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Richard Gaskin wrote:

> Judy Perry wrote:
> > Your 'average' DC user isn't likely to roll his/her own *anything*.
> >
> > Once you become a real geek, it is soooo easy to forget about the millions
> > and maybe billions of people who are not.
>
> Agreed.  That's what separates scripters from point-and-click authors.
>
> But as a scripting product, this puts DC in a mistmatch with its
> greatest potential audience....