If exists question

[Scott Rossi]

On 3/29/04 5:49 PM, "Ken Norris" <pixelbird at interisland.net> wrote:

>> wait 30 milliseconds -- put in to allow Rev to catch up with functions
> ----------
> Just FYI...a 'wait' command basically just stalls the script and hogs the
> processor. It won't help Rev catch up to anything.
> 
> What you want to do is: send <myMessage> to me (a handler) in 30
> milliseconds.
> 
> That keeps the script running and just puts a timer on when the next
> execution takes place, which _does_ allow the interpreter to catch up.

Actually, you can use wait:

  wait 30 milliseconds with messages

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Development & Design
-----
E: scott at tactilemedia.com
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com