Split followed by Transpose

[Glen Bojsza]

Dar,

I thought that the split command actually would put the data into the 
format that transpose recognizes ...what you have indicated?

Isn't it just as much work to put it into this format as it would be to 
write a function that would transpose the data from the original array?

Sorry for not understanding ( or possibly assuming).

Are there any scripts already done that handle different array 
manipulations?

Thanks for the insight... this saves me going down the wrong path.

Glen

> 1,1   23
> 1,2   33
> 2,1   12
> 2,2   67


On Monday, March 22, 2004, at 08:53 PM, Dar Scott wrote:

>
> On Monday, March 22, 2004, at 07:27 PM, Glen Bojsza wrote:
>
>> I am testing the transpose command and can't seem to figure it out
>>
>> I have a field "test"
>> 1	23	33
>> 2	12	67
>
> 1,1   23
> 1,2   33
> 2,1   12
> 2,2   67
>
> How does it work for that?
>
> You might want to consider making a function that takes something like 
> this
>
> 23   33
> 12   67
>
> or this
>
> [ 23 33 ; 12 67 ]
>
> (as in MatLab, I think),
>
> or this
>
> [ 23 33
>   12 67 ]
>
> And the inverse function, too.
>
> Dar Scott
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>