substack question

[Thomas J McGrath III]

Why are you not just using the open stack in your stacks???

You can open a stack outside of your mainstack and use it as a palette 
in your main stack. it does not have to be a sub of a sub of a sub. it 
can just be separate completely from the beginning.

FWIW

Tom

On Jan 22, 2004, at 7:48 AM, Doug Lerner wrote:

> On 1/22/04 9:26 PM, "Doug Lerner" <doug at webcrossing.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/22/04 6:16 PM, "Brian Yennie" <briany at qldlearning.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Not quite. You can have as many levels as you want, but the 
>>> "mainStack"
>>> property must always refer to a stack which is _not_ a substack at 
>>> the
>>> time, thus the building up instead of down I suggested. I think my
>>> workaround may work for you.
>>>
>>> If it's mainly a script-sharing issue, you can also use the "start
>>> using" command (or "library") to make a stack's scripts available
>>> wherever you need them.
>>
>> I'll take a look at "start using". I can't get a sub-sub-stack to 
>> work no
>> matter what combination I try.
>
> Whoa! That "start using" command sure caused a zillion unexpected and 
> weird
> weird weird results that took me a while to disentangle from! I better 
> find
> a different way...
>
> doug
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>

Macintosh PowerBook G-4 OSX 10.3.1, OS 9.2.2, 1.25 GHz, 512MB RAM, Rev 
2.1.2


Advanced Media Group
Thomas J McGrath III	• 2003 •	3mcgrath at adelphia.net
220 Drake Road, Bethel Park, PA 15102