Transcript and/or ECMA - guess who started it?

[J. Landman Gay]

On 2/18/04 12:48 PM, Ops wrote:

> True enough Richard, but, I'm sure Rev resources are not unlimited, and 
> if this is done at a long-term cost to the efficacy of the existing 
> product, then I'm sure all would agree that those efforts would be 
> "foot-shooting"...I for one, would like Rev to stay ontrack with the 
> existing structure and not go off on tangents that would (IMHO) make the 
> core product suffer.

I agree completely. The "cool factor" of alternate scripting languages 
should be a future enhancement. It would be nice to have, but I didn't 
mean to imply it should be done immediately. Just something to think 
about later on.

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com