RunRev vs RealBasic

Lynch, Jonathan BNZ2 at CDC.GOV
Thu Dec 30 16:28:10 EST 2004


Not being the expert that some of these folks are - I can only respond
with exactly what you do not want to hear - ease of use...

If I can create a program in an hour that does the same thing as a
program that takes 3 or 4 hours to create in another development
environment, then I will be very happy. Ease of use, time spent learning
the system, and time spent programming. Time is a commodity of great
value.

Cheers,

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com
[mailto:use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of
cdunix at praevius.com
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 1:09 PM
To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Subject: RunRev vs RealBasic

Hello All,

Being new to this list and a current RB user, I would like to see your
reasons
for using the more expensive Runtime Enterprise environment vs. the
RealBasic
Professional environment.  I am not concerned so much about "ease of
use" as
much as I am about capabilities.  For instance, how does RunRev handle
database
connectivity?  Does it do 3D or OpenGL rendering well?  Does it support
a
"plug-in" architecture?  What level of system integration does the
software
have;  any direct access to system APIs?

Thanks in advance,
Michael

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


More information about the use-livecode mailing list