QT Player only?

Barry Levine themacguy at macosx.com
Tue Sep 23 22:06:01 EDT 2003


Graham,

I prefer to write apps that are cross-platform; hence the need for Rev 
-and- QuickTime. My customers are mostly selling into K12; anything 
less than 100% cross-platform won't cut it.

While Microsloth casts itself in the role of "standards-bearer", we all 
know better and have found that we have to "program around" the 
limitations that that 800-lb gorilla would otherwise impose.

"Microsoft Innovation"? What a crock. (Sorry; that's getting way OT.)

Barry

On Tuesday, Sep 23, 2003, at 15:36 America/Denver, Graham wrote:
>
> From: Graham Samuel <livfoss at blueyonder.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: QT Player only?
> Reply-To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:44:31 -0700, Richard Gaskin
> <ambassador at fourthworld.com> wrote:
>>
>> But on the flipside, while jumping through the hoops is merely silly 
>> and
>> inconvenient it cost nothing more than a few minutes' time.
>>
>> You can grab the license at:
>> <<http://developer.apple.com/mkt/swl/quicktime.html>>
>>
>
> I know, but up to now I can't persuade my publisher it's a good idea
> - and they do know their market (British schools) really well. It's
> different of course with Mac-only apps.
>
> Graham




More information about the use-livecode mailing list