JDBC instead of ODBC
todd at geistinteractive.com
Sat Oct 4 19:14:01 EDT 2003
On 10/4/03 12:26 PM, "Alex Rice" <alex at mindlube.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 11:49 AM, Todd Geist wrote:
>> But what about all those database engines that can use JDBC?
>> I know some of them are already supported by Rev but wouldn't it be
>> nice to
>> have a single method to connect to all those databases that didn't
>> setting up and configuring ODBC?
> But JDBC is for JAVA apps/applets. Java programmers we are not. Maybe I
> am missing your point.
Well not always. For example:
There is a FileMaker Pro plug-in which can connect to any database that has
JDBC access. I have used this plug-in to retrieve data from and edit data
on Firebird, MySQL, and Postgres servers. There was very little difference
in the code, and it was very fast. (Why am I using FileMaker? That's
FileMaker's plug-in API is C/C++, not Java. So the developers of the
plug-in had to write some kind of C/C++ wrapper around the java code. I was
imagining that some clever Rev Nut could do the same thing for Revolution.
Maybe as others have pointed out there is no need.
g e i s t i n t e r a c t i v e
web hosting web design application design
More information about the Use-livecode