Rotating Images: the rot sets in...

[Monte Goulding]

Jeanne

When you quote yourself you should start with:

A great revolutionary once said:

Cheers ;-)

Monte
>
> Quote:
>
> "The rotation operation does not have an inverse. Since some amount of
> distortion is unavoidable when rotating an image by an amount
> that is not a
> multiple of 90 degrees, rotating an image clockwise, then counterclockwise
> by the same amount does not completely restore the original image.
>
> To rotate an image in a reversible way, set its angle property instead of
> using the rotate command. Unlike the rotate command, the angle property
> affects only the screen display of the image, not the actual picture data
> in it."
>
> Unquote. ;-)
>
> --
> Jeanne A. E. DeVoto ~ jeanne at runrev.com
> Runtime Revolution Limited - Software at the Speed of Thought
> http://www.runrev.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>