Question on .rev file format

[Monte Goulding]

> Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> > There was an mcRipper to save a stack as XML but I think it
> crashes 2.x. It
> > shouldn't be too hard to modify though. I'd be very interested
> in a system
> > that created individual XML files for each object with
> references to each
> > other. That way it would be possible to muck around with the
> relationships
> > between objects to improve reuse & maintainability. For example
> you could
> > use the same card on two stacks and maintain the one source.
>
> Yeah, lots of advantages.  I looked at the code in Application Browser
> and it all looks doable, though I am not sure you can get all of the
> properties of an object (at least, this is what the docs say for
> "properties").  I guess XML is as good a format as any.
>

Whatever properties that aren't in the properties array could be requested
individually. Unless we can get a list of them from RunRev it would be trial
and error to work out exactly what properties are listed under 'Others'. but
the properties array is a great place to start. In addition,
customProperties and customPropertySets would be needed.