Shuffle

[miscdas at boxfrog.com]

curry writes:
[snip]
> 
>>  > (And actually, if you really wanted to be perfect, you might improve  
>> > it by multiplying the number of lines or items by a desired amount for  
>> > your random number parameter, so you have less chance of two lines  > 
>> having the same random number and (I assume) remaining in the order  > 
>> they originally were in the list.) 
>> 

===========
But then, you no longer have a randomized list... You now have a non-random 
function based on random. 

miscdas