DLL Absence

[Dar Scott]

On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 01:50 PM, Alex Rice wrote:

> On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 12:59  PM, Dar Scott wrote:
>> But when somebody says "I did the DLL-call thing to get a list of 
>> watchamacallits from the system and all I got was garbage" then it is 
>> hard to tell whether one has set up the call right or whether 
>> "pointer to unsigned long" is broken or whether the right system call 
>> is being made.
>
> True. But the success rate would be a lot higher, possibly leading to 
> less support effort overall. Just a guess.

But if the success rate is a lot higher then lots and lots more people 
will be using Revolution and support requirements will be going way up! 
  Wait.  That's OK in that case.

Dar Scott