Can I do "Digest Authentification"

[RGould8 at aol.com]

How about this for a document on Digest Authentification - - - this seems a 
bit more readible:

http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/stories/2002/07/09/webServicesSecurityHttpD

igestAuthenticationWithoutActiveDirectory.html


In a message dated 11/19/02 4:33:16 PM, dcragg at lacscentre.co.uk writes:


> At 1:32 pm -0700 19/11/02, Dar Scott wrote:
> >On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 12:15 PM, Dave Cragg wrote:
> >
> >>  I also haven't done this, but
> >
> >LOL!  Poor Rob Gould has to risk his career on a rumor!
> >
> >Well, you have three who say it "should" work.  You have to judge
> >yourself, Rob.
> 
> I'm sure it'll be a piece of cake, Rob. :)  But please let us know
> what you come up with. The truth is I just want someone else to
> interpret section 3.2.2 of the rfc on digest authorization. I'm
> trying to preserve what few brain cells I have remaining.
> 
> If only J.K. Rowling wrote rfc documents.
> 
> Cheers
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-livecode/attachments/20021119/71028d9a/attachment.html>